News

Survey: Devs Adopting Open Source, But Management Lacking

Development software and services provider Sonatype earlier this month surveyed more than 1600 developers, architects and managers regarding the deployment and use of open source solutions in the development infrastructure. The survey revealed that dev organizations have widely deployed open source tools and solutions, but with little effective control and management.

According to the survey, fully 83 percent of respondents reported having deployed open source development tools, with 50 percent saying those deployments had been adopted as part of a corporate standard. While more than half of the surveyed firms identified poor integration between tools as a top complaint, the larger concern may be the lack of control over open source tool deployments.

"These things start organically, but then spread and grow up in the enterprise," said Charles Gold, chief marketing officer at Sonatype. "What we're hearing most often is that companies really love the tools, but that they need better support and integration in order to extend their usage even further."

Lack of control over open source deployments was a real issue, according to the survey. Eighty-seven percent of respondents said their organizations "exert little control over the use of open source components," with 42 percent stating they had no corporate standard for adopting open source dev tooling. Another 45 percent said they had standards, but they were not enforced.

Leaving Money on the Table
"By some estimates, $70 billion is spent each year on custom software development and 40 percent of that is wasted," Gold said. "Many organizations adopt open source to improve the efficiency and cost effectiveness of their custom development initiatives. But without controls they're leaving money on the table."

Gold urged development managers to focus on two key areas when managing open source solutions -- integration and support.

"Many organizations fall into the trap of do-it-yourself integration between their tools. Then, as adoption increases and various components change, their integrations become increasingly fragile," Gold said of the integration challenge facing many companies.

He also urged organizations standardizing on open source software to seek support from a dedicated provider, rather than rely on internal resources.

"When your team is supporting your tools rather than writing software -- you're losing the benefits of using open source software," Gold said.

About the Author

Michael Desmond is an editor and writer for 1105 Media's Enterprise Computing Group.

comments powered by Disqus

Featured

  • Mastering AI Development and Building AI Apps with GitHub Copilot

    Two Microsoft experts explain how GitHub Copilot is evolving from a coding assistant into a broader platform for building, customizing and testing AI-powered developer workflows.

  • VS Code 1.123 Adds Agent Session Sync, 1M Context Windows

    Microsoft released Visual Studio Code 1.123 on June 3, adding agent-focused features, larger model context support, integrated browser updates and a new delay for some automatic extension updates.

  • Copilot Billing Shock Hits Developers

    Developer complaints about GitHub Copilot's new usage-based billing model have centered on unexpectedly rapid AI credit consumption, and neither GitHub nor Microsoft has responded directly to the backlash, though they have previously published guidance to lessen model usage costs.

  • Hands On with GitHub Copilot App Technical Preview: Turning a Blazor Issue into a PR

    GitHub's brand-new Copilot desktop app, in technical preview, handled a small Blazor issue from planning through pull request creation, but the hands-on test also showed why developers still need to verify agent work in the running app before merging.

Subscribe on YouTube