News

Reports: Microsoft May be Ditching 'Metro'

Possible copyright violations of the name are cited.

Is "Metro-style" about to lose its "Metro"?

It's looking that way, if media reports are correct.

The "Metro" name, which is associated with the forthcoming Windows 8 operating system, may be dropped by Microsoft.

Microsoft today gave an indication that its Metro nomenclature, used to describe both a design style and a user interface (UI) in Windows 8, could be scrapped in the near future. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed a statement that was provided today to veteran Microsoft observer Mary Jo Foley, who reported the potential change. Foley's unnamed sources suggested that Metro could be banned, possibly because of "copyright" issues.

In its statement, Microsoft oddly describes Metro as a "code name" and suggests it could be changed by the time Windows 8 is launched as a product.

"We have used Metro style as a code name during the product development cycle across many of our product lines," the Microsoft spokesperson stated via e-mail. "As we get closer to launch and transition from industry dialog to a broad consumer dialog we will use our commercial names."

No further details were provided by Microsoft. Windows 8 is scheduled for general availability on October 26.

Windows 8 has a Metro (UI) and a desktop UI within the operating system. The Metro side displays a flat, tile-based interface that's similar to what users find on Windows Phone, and it's optimized for touch. In contrast, the desktop UI of Windows 8 is supposed to have more of typical chromed border look for apps, and they have ribbon-style menus. However, during a recent presentation of the next Office 365 apps, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer blurred the distinction between the two UI styles.

"We've transformed in this process Office also to embrace some of the same design concepts and principles that we've showed you in Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8 and in Metro," Ballmer said, early during the talk, according to a Microsoft transcript.

However, Microsoft has shown very few of its own Metro-style apps so far. The one standout exception is the currently available OneNote MX, which is a Metro-style Windows 8 app that's part of Office 2013.

The distinction between the Windows 8 UIs is important -- at least for developers. Mozilla and Google have both complained that they must build their browsers for the desktop side of Windows 8 only. Their browsers won't have access to the same APIs on the Windows RT (Windows on ARM) side of Windows 8 as Microsoft's Internet Explorer 10 browser will have, Mozilla and Google have indicated.

Michael Cherry, research vice president for operating systems at Directions on Microsoft, a Kirkland, Wash.-based independent consultancy, pointed to the roots of Metro at Microsoft. The design concept is supposed to be based on the sort of clear signage found in airport terminals and other passenger depots.

"To me, Metro provided a guiding principle to the simplification of the message such that it was easily recognizable what was expected of you," Cherry said, in a phone interview. "And it was very comforting and confirming…on where you wanted to go."

He added that it would be a shame for Microsoft to drop the Metro name because of these guiding roots. He's even designing his own Metro-style Windows 8 app along those lines.

Cherry also speculated that Microsoft may want to reshape the marketing associated with Metro due to future availability of Metro-style apps.

"I think the one reason that they might want to downplay the [Metro] name is that they want to downplay this difference that there's two pieces," Cherry explained. "Say, for example, when I look at Windows 8 right now, I try to ask myself, 'Now, why would I use it if there aren't Metro apps that I can use.' Whereas, if they [Microsoft] can get us out of this mindset about Metro, then they can go back and say, 'Well, there a lot of Windows 8 apps'."

Another possible reason for the shift in nomenclature has to do with Windows 8 coming to Windows Phone.

"Windows Phone is going to be using, to a large extent, some of the same components [as Window 8]," Cherry said. "Instead of being built on [Windows] CE, it's going to be built on Windows 8. So again, they may be trying to get us to think about this as Windows 8 apps."

He added that Microsoft could even start to downplay the "desktop" term as well.

About the Author

Kurt Mackie is online news editor for the 1105 Enterprise Computing Group.

comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments:

Wed, Aug 8, 2012 Fred

Jonjo, their branding strategy is very obvious to the majority of us. That's not flying over our heads. What is confusing is their approach to getting the general public to move into that branded world. I would think that they would use Win 8 as a stepping stone to that branded world but instead it is more like stepping off a cliff and falling into that branded world. Would it be so difficult to provide a couple of visual cues to indicate how to a new user how to bring up the login window or charm bar? Something like a faded watermark image of the old start button to indicate where to hover the mouse to get back to the start menu? And then maybe in Windows 9 yank out the start button altogether. To me that is a smoother transition than what they are forcing upon the users in Windows 8. No one is doubting the technical and marketing benefits of a unified UX across all form factors. We're just questioning the method in which they are introducing (or forcing) that UX unto the customer.

Wed, Aug 8, 2012 Jonjo

some do not understand the reasons for Microsoft decision, but there are some of us that do see the business an the technical behind their decision. In business you build a brand, and Microsoft is building a brand through out all of their products Windows 8 is one piece of that brand building strategy, users will feel comfortable when they use a tablet, a phone, and a pc only because they all will look similar, that is their approach. The technical part of it is that building a piece of software that can be ported between systems is a no brainer. If I use a bank application why would I have to install the same app in three different places with different information. These apps can be applied to an Account and all devices using that account will use the same application, and with cloud bases services they will use the same data. That makes sense from a technical perspective. Not maintaining three different code bases is a dream for any developer that has build for all Microsoft devices in the past. I welcome this change and looking forward to building one app for all devices.

Wed, Aug 8, 2012 Fred

Have any of you guys seen this youtube video of a guy filming his dad use Win 8 for the first time? http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=v4boTbv9_nU

Wed, Aug 8, 2012 Fred

I have been using Win 8 at home for quite some time now so my opinions are based from my experience with the OS. Win 8 in both Metro and desktop is drastically different than all previous versions of Windows. IMHO, a lot of non-techie users will be lost and confused. Time will tell all. I honestly hope I am wrong. Would love nothing better than to see Metro/Win8/WinPhone8 be a huge hit. But from a practical point of view I just don't see it happening.

Tue, Aug 7, 2012

It sounds like many of you haven't bothered to learn about Windows 8 at all. First, the desktop still exists, and your existing applications will work just fine. What's new are Metro-style apps, which are meant to be simple, easy to use and understand, and deliver information even when they're not running. And Microsoft has made it known that not apps need to be converted. Some apps still belong on the desktop. I can understand that your first impression of Windows 8 may be "What is Microsoft thinking?" but before you condemn Windows 8, try to understand all the reasons behind it.

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 Craig Ohio

I am not impressed with the "Metro" design style, look and feel, whatever you wish to label or call it. If this is the future, we might consider dusting off the monochrome monitors in the attic and use them for displays. I was exposed to Metro when I got VS 2012. This is such a drastic departure from what has been the norm for the last 20+ years. Maybe they can call it "Retro" because in my honest opinion, they have taken a big step backwards in UI development. Only time will tell.....

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 Steve Chicago

As a developer who rarely sees his desktop for any reason I doubt I'll be a big user of the Metro front end; my wife and kids on the other hand will likely embrace it. I think the riskiest part of this is the divergence of the 'RT' version; asking for trouble trying to call it the same product (Win8) with such wildly different architectures / capabilities. For what its worth on the topic I turn off all the enhancements as well; my Win 7 desktop looks like my XP desktop which looks like my Win 2k desktop... and so on. Skinny monochrome grey bars rule.

Tue, Aug 7, 2012

AMEN! But MS needs to ditch more than the "Metro" name – they need to scrap that design paradigm alltogether. It's lame, it's horrendously ugly, it's not intuitive, and the bulk of users have no interest in it (just witness the abysmal failure of the Windows Phone). As a professional developer, I see no value whatsoever in learning how to make "Metro" apps (or whatever MS wants to call them). Furthermore, I WILL NOT upgrade to Win 8 unless it is first-and-foremost a desktop-centric OS. Microsoft needs to seriously reconsider its approach to Win 8 before it turns out to be another Windows ME-like failure. Say "NO" to Metro!!!

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 Tim

Soooo... a new name is needed. How about Flatus? Kidding, but really there is absolutely nothing about the Metro UI that appeals to me on the desktop. But then again, I've been running in 'XP Classic' view, no silly slow-me-down visuals, ever since XP.

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 Binroe

I have to agree with Fred: the Metro UI makes sense on a table, but for us desktop users? I might skip Win8 just like I skipped Vista. Or consider an alternative OS...

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 Fred

I understand why MS is pushing so hard for Metro when Win 8 is is tablet mode. But I've yet to grasp why they are trying so desperately to pretend as if the desktop doesn't exist anymore. I see a big backlash coming with the release of Win 8. You can't just click the undo button and magically erase the general public's last 17 years experience with windows. Folks are going to be PO'd!

Add Your Comments Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above