.NET Tips and Tricks

Blog archive

Omitting and Including Debug Code

I'm working on an application that allows users to retrieve and then filter/sort their data. The rules for filtering the data seem especially bizarre to me (there are actually two sets of filters) and the users keep piling on requirements.

Since I'm modifying existing code (and don't want to take the time to rip it all out and start over again) I've been including some code to print out useful information to the Output window that helps me debug problems. I don't want this code to go into production, of course, because it would slow the application down microscopically.

I've also got to test how this whole application works based on the security of the particular user. The application determines what security to apply by reading my Windows logon Id and then validating that against a table of users. Changing my security settings would require me to log off and log back on as another user every time I wanted to run through a set of tests. To simplify testing, therefore, I've put in a backdoor that lets me arbitrarily set my security level. I really don't want that code to make it into production.

The Conditional attribute is what saves my Canadian bacon here. I simply include my offending code in a method and mark it with the Conditional attribute. I pass the Conditional attribute some test that checks a compiler variable to see if the method should be included. This example checks to see if a constant called DEBUG is present:

<Conditional("DEBUG")>
Public Sub AssignSecurity

End Sub

I use the DEBUG constant because it's automatically included by Visual Studio when you're compiling in debug mode…and automatically excluded when you compile in release mode (though you can override that).

As you can imagine, I still worry that my security bypass code will make it into production. To help ensure that it doesn't, I have another method, that puts a big red "IN TEST MODE, NOT SECURE" message on the title screen when I'm running in non-secure mode. In addition, before arbitrarily setting the security settings, my code looks for a digitally encrypted key only installed on my development machine. I still worry ... but I can live with that.

Posted by Peter Vogel on 03/11/2015


comments powered by Disqus

Featured

  • VS Code Copilot Previews New GPT-4o AI Code Completion Model

    The 4o upgrade includes additional training on more than 275,000 high-quality public repositories in over 30 popular programming languages, said Microsoft-owned GitHub, which created the original "AI pair programmer" years ago.

  • Microsoft's Rust Embrace Continues with Azure SDK Beta

    "Rust's strong type system and ownership model help prevent common programming errors such as null pointer dereferencing and buffer overflows, leading to more secure and stable code."

  • Xcode IDE from Microsoft Archrival Apple Gets Copilot AI

    Just after expanding the reach of its Copilot AI coding assistant to the open-source Eclipse IDE, Microsoft showcased how it's going even further, providing details about a preview version for the Xcode IDE from archrival Apple.

  • Introduction to .NET Aspire

    Two Microsoft experts will present on the cloud-native application stack designed to simplify the development of distributed systems in .NET at the Visual Studio Live! developer conference coming to Las Vegas next month.

  • Microsoft Previews Copilot AI for Open-Source Eclipse IDE

    Catering to Java jockeys, Microsoft is yet again expanding the sprawling reach of its Copilot-branded AI assistants, previewing a coding tool for the open-source Eclipse IDE.

Subscribe on YouTube

Upcoming Training Events