Practical .NET

The Best Option for Selecting Related LINQ Objects

Here's the best performing option when you're retrieving the objects at the end of an entity class's navigation property, either when you only want some of the objects or when you only want them some of the time.

This is the second (or third?) option I've found for retrieving related Entity Framework objects in a LINQ query, either when you only want some of the related objects or when you only want them some of the time. The problem I'm addressing is when, for example, you want to retrieve only some of the SalesOrders for a Customer or want to retrieve SalesOrders only for some Customers.

In these scenarios, for the best possible performance, you want to reduce the data transferred by retrieving only the SalesOrders you need. And, for best performance, you also want to retrieve all the rows (both Customers and SalesOrders) in a single trip to the database. I also assume you want to achieve these goals with readable code.

The simplest, most effective way to do that is to incorporate the LINQ queries that retrieve the related rows into your Select statement.

For example, assume that you want to retrieve Customers objects with their related SalesOrders -- but only those SalesOrders with a ShipDate in the future. To achieve that, in the Select clause, you build an anonymous object with two properties: one to hold the Customer object and one to hold all of the Customer's future SalesOrders. To implement this solution all you have to do is load the SalesOrders property from a LINQ statement in the Select clause, like this:

From c In db.Customers
Select New With {.Customer = c,
                 .SalesOrders = (From so In c.SalesOrders
                                 Where so.ShipDate > DateTime.Now
                                 Select so)}

It gets better: You're not restricted to using properties tied to the object at the end of the navigation property. This query retrieves all the Customers but only retrieves SalesOrders for the Customers whose Valid property is set to True:

From c In c.Customer
Select New With {.Customer = c,
                 .SalesOrders = (From so In c.SalesOrders
                                 Where c.Valid
                                 Select so)}

The good news is that the SQL statement that's issued in both cases gives you the best possible performance, at least with SQL Server: The SQL statement joins the Customer and SalesOrder tables together while integrating the Where clauses to retrieve all (and only) the rows you want. And does it in one trip to the database.

I think it's pretty readable, too.

About the Author

Peter Vogel is a system architect and principal in PH&V Information Services. PH&V provides full-stack consulting from UX design through object modeling to database design. Peter tweets about his VSM columns with the hashtag #vogelarticles. His blog posts on user experience design can be found at http://blog.learningtree.com/tag/ui/.

comments powered by Disqus

Featured

  • Compare New GitHub Copilot Free Plan for Visual Studio/VS Code to Paid Plans

    The free plan restricts the number of completions, chat requests and access to AI models, being suitable for occasional users and small projects.

  • Diving Deep into .NET MAUI

    Ever since someone figured out that fiddling bits results in source code, developers have sought one codebase for all types of apps on all platforms, with Microsoft's latest attempt to further that effort being .NET MAUI.

  • Copilot AI Boosts Abound in New VS Code v1.96

    Microsoft improved on its new "Copilot Edit" functionality in the latest release of Visual Studio Code, v1.96, its open-source based code editor that has become the most popular in the world according to many surveys.

  • AdaBoost Regression Using C#

    Dr. James McCaffrey from Microsoft Research presents a complete end-to-end demonstration of the AdaBoost.R2 algorithm for regression problems (where the goal is to predict a single numeric value). The implementation follows the original source research paper closely, so you can use it as a guide for customization for specific scenarios.

  • Versioning and Documenting ASP.NET Core Services

    Building an API with ASP.NET Core is only half the job. If your API is going to live more than one release cycle, you're going to need to version it. If you have other people building clients for it, you're going to need to document it.

Subscribe on YouTube