News

AI for GitHub Collaboration? Maybe Not So Much

No doubt GitHub Copilot has been a boon for developers, but AI might not be the best tool for collaboration, according to developers weighing in on a recent social media post from the GitHub team.

GitHub this morning posted, "How are you using AI to collaborate on GitHub?"

How are you using AI to collaborate on GitHub?
[Click on image for larger view.] How are you using AI to collaborate on GitHub? (source: X).

While it's only been live for about five hours at the time of this writing, it has attracted more than 40,000 views and 30 comments, many of which seem to be skeptical about using AI for collaboration.

Some example replies:

  • Not… 😅 As in, besides it is an LLM an not AI, but it is helpful at times... However, "collaborate" is far fetched IMHO. Or am I missing something?
  • Tried GitHub Copilot, but it's not free now, so I use ChatGPT to collaborate
  • Nope.
  • 🤔 hmm
  • I guess I'm participating in that copilot has slurped my code from github. Is that what you mean?
  • Sadly not in an efficient way. It would be awesome if GitHub Copilot would be available in Issues, Discussions and had integration APIs so that I can tell it to make multiple issues out of one and reference them directly, search for duplicates and automatically link them etc.
  • Not really [two of these]
  • Should I be using AI for this?
  • Stop.
  • I close Pull Request and Issues in my projects that are obviously AI-generated garbage. Thanks, LLMs, for making it easier for idiots to waste time of maintainers with useless changes that need more than a quick glance to look useless!

Along with the snarkiness and negativity, there were some more substantive responses like:

  • AI is revolutionizing how we handle CI/CD pipelines on GitHub! We're leveraging machine learning to automate testing and deployment processes, which significantly enhances our efficiency and reduces human error. It's exciting to see AI streamline our workflows and ensure more reliable releases.
  • Integrated copilot into IntelliJ and it helped very efficiently.
  • Mostly snippet

More responses are surely coming, though, so stay tuned.

About the Author

David Ramel is an editor and writer at Converge 360.

comments powered by Disqus

Featured

  • Compare New GitHub Copilot Free Plan for Visual Studio/VS Code to Paid Plans

    The free plan restricts the number of completions, chat requests and access to AI models, being suitable for occasional users and small projects.

  • Diving Deep into .NET MAUI

    Ever since someone figured out that fiddling bits results in source code, developers have sought one codebase for all types of apps on all platforms, with Microsoft's latest attempt to further that effort being .NET MAUI.

  • Copilot AI Boosts Abound in New VS Code v1.96

    Microsoft improved on its new "Copilot Edit" functionality in the latest release of Visual Studio Code, v1.96, its open-source based code editor that has become the most popular in the world according to many surveys.

  • AdaBoost Regression Using C#

    Dr. James McCaffrey from Microsoft Research presents a complete end-to-end demonstration of the AdaBoost.R2 algorithm for regression problems (where the goal is to predict a single numeric value). The implementation follows the original source research paper closely, so you can use it as a guide for customization for specific scenarios.

  • Versioning and Documenting ASP.NET Core Services

    Building an API with ASP.NET Core is only half the job. If your API is going to live more than one release cycle, you're going to need to version it. If you have other people building clients for it, you're going to need to document it.

Subscribe on YouTube