Developer's Toolkit

Blog archive

Microsoft and Software Engineering

Last fall, at the invitation of Visual Studio editor Patrick Meader, I wrote an editorial note on the subject of whether Microsoft products were enterprise-ready. After some thought, I concluded in the negative, not because of the products themselves, but at least partially because of the poor reputation of its own software development practices. "If Microsoft development teams use state of the art software engineering processes and tools, measure and manage risk, and adhere to their schedules," I said at the time, "the company needs to make this known, and make these processes and tools widely available as best practices."

Someone at Microsoft must have heard, because Russ Ryan, Product Unit Manager with the Visual Studio team, spoke in a VSLive keynote entitled 'How We Make the Sausage: Lessons from "the Factory Floor" on How Microsoft Does Software Engineering.' Because of my previous statements, I felt obligated to attend. That Microsoft was willing to discuss this topic in front of an audience of fifteen hundred software engineers was encouraging.

After listening to Russ, my impression is that Microsoft software engineering practices are no better than average, though trending better. Testing and fixing bugs were the big stories, but there were no state of the art software engineering practices, no research results cited, and no experimentation that could result in moving the industry as a whole forward. If this is representative of all Microsoft product groups, it was a disappointment that the company is not pushing the boundary of software engineering research and practice. If Microsoft cannot advance its own software engineering practices, what hope does the software industry have? I expect leadership from the leading software company, and it is clearly not there.

One positive note out of the session was the statement from Russ that "Superman doesn't scale." This, of course, refers to the stories of marathon coding and debugging stretches and rapid burnout among Microsoft coders. Acknowledging you have a problem is the first step to fixing it. But fixing a big problem isn't the same thing as being a leader.

Posted by Peter Varhol on 02/05/2006


comments powered by Disqus

Featured

  • Uno Platform Wants Microsoft to Improve .NET WebAssembly in Two Ways

    Uno Platform, a third-party dev tooling specialist that caters to .NET developers, published a report on the state of WebAssembly, addressing some shortcomings in the .NET implementation it would like to see Microsoft address.

  • Random Neighborhoods Regression Using C#

    Dr. James McCaffrey from Microsoft Research presents a complete end-to-end demonstration of the random neighborhoods regression technique, where the goal is to predict a single numeric value. Compared to other ML regression techniques, advantages are that it can handle both large and small datasets, and the results are highly interpretable.

  • As Some Orgs Restrict DeepSeek AI Usage, Microsoft Offers Models and Dev Guidance

    While some organizations are restricting employee usage of the new open source DeepSeek AI from a Chinese company due to data collection concerns, Microsoft has taken a different approach.

  • Useful New-ish Features in .NET/C#

    We often hear about the big new features in .NET or C#, but what about all of those lesser known, but useful new features? How exactly do you use constructs like collection indices and ranges, date features, and pattern matching?

  • TypeScript 5.8 Beta Speeds Program Loads, Updates

    "TypeScript 5.8 introduces a number of optimizations that can both improve the time to build up a program, and also to update a program based on a file change in either --watch mode or editor scenarios."

Subscribe on YouTube