News

Planix Tool Takes on Build-and-Test Guesstimates

Planix, from ALTERthought, gives the best- and worst-case time scenarios for agile-development projects.

Getting projects done on time and under budget is the Holy Grail for development managers. Longstanding methodologies for estimating the size, complexity and cost of a software dev project include function point analysis and constructive cost modeling. But overall estimation is an inexact science.

The software engineering consultancy ALTERthought hopes to change that with its hosted application Planix. The service takes high-level information about a project-use cases or the "user stories" found in agile development -- and crunches that data with proprietary methodology to generate estimates for a project's build-and-test phase. Users can generate various outcome scenarios, from "most likely" to "best-case" and "worst-case," as well as "what-if" scenarios.

ALTERthought CEO Sunjay Pandey says Planix can help developers and organizational leaders formulate a more realistic project plan. "Stakeholders are notoriously visionary and optimistic," he says. "That's great, and you want to keep that vision for the business, but Planix lets you put it all down in black and white."

The tool provides project estimates based on a number of factors, including its depth and range of planned features; the complexity of the tools and languages being used; and the abilities of team members. It's also calibrated for a variety of languages and platform -- including C#, Java, J2EE, .NET, Ruby and Ruby on Rails -- delivering estimates that reflect the programming environment.

Planix is a beneficial tool for most development teams and projects, according to Pandey. "We've seen it work for projects that are 500 to 600 hours in size [and for] projects that are 14,000 hours in size," he says. "But it's probably not applicable on tiny projects -- something that's going to take less than two or three weeks."

Despite this, Pandey says the product does not run counter to the agile dev model. "There has been a perception that it's anti-agile. But agile is based on planning your project on what people are telling you." He describes Planix as a "marriage of formal planning and formal estimation in conjunction with the principles of the Agile Manifesto that is probably more practical than either one alone."

Planix is now in public beta.

About the Author

Chris Kanaracus is the news editor for Redmond Developer News.

comments powered by Disqus

Featured

  • Copilot AI Billing Shock Met with Meters, Caps and Token-Saving Tools

    GitHub is layering spending limits, expanded credit allowances and increasingly granular usage reporting onto Copilot, while Microsoft is reworking Visual Studio and VS Code to expose -- and reduce -- the cost of agentic development.

  • The AI-Powered Software Development Lifecycle

    René van Osnabrugge makes the case that AI's biggest opportunity in software development is not faster coding -- it's reducing the friction everywhere else in the SDLC.

  • Copilot Usage-Based Billing Gets a Token Dashboard

    Microsoft is keeping Visual Studio's new built-in Agent Skills switched off by default while a public dashboard measures whether their performance gains justify the additional tokens they may consume.

  • VS Code 1.129 Introduces Agent Host and Experimental Agents Window Editor

    Visual Studio Code 1.129 adds a dedicated process for running AI agent sessions and an experimental docked editor for reviewing agent-generated changes.

Subscribe on YouTube