In-Depth

Mapping Security to Services-Oriented Architecture

What security hurdles can you overcome when using XML to develop against a services layer? A whiteboard diagram of security requirements mappings in an SOA shows you the way.

Architects developing against a services layer using XML, rather than directly against an ERP/legacy layer, face three security challenges: 1) persisting a "security context" from the end user or client to the business systems; 2) ensuring that an unauthorized user sending malicious XML is blocked from the Web service; and 3) blocking rogue XML messages that bypass the XML gateway.

To understand how security requirements are mapped to a typical services-oriented architecture, the diagram shows Web services deployed at the consumer and access layers (through Web portals where end users interface indirectly with Web services and in application-to-application communication where no end user is involved), and at the services layer (across an XML message bus or other type of orchestration engine). At the systems layer, business applications have security profiles that must be mapped to the end users or Web service, client applications.

To avoid losing the client/user security context between the access layer (where the identity of the client or user is authenticated) and the services layer (where applications authorize and tailor responses to the end user or client), security tokens (such as a SAML assertion or WS-Security UsernameToken) are inserted into XML messages.

With wireless LANs, VPNs, and distributed networks, passing XML traffic to the services layer through the XML gateway cannot always be guaranteed. Therefore, security must be "deperimeterized" by enforcing security rules at the services layer, close to the end point.

To pass security context with XML messages sent to and within a services layer, architectures should reuse existing directories with user or policy information rather than establishing a new silo just for Web services. An XML security server, containing links to existing security architecture, is used to for this purpose.

Remember that availability and administration are aspects of security, too. Existing network management tools can be reused to aggregate alerts and quality-of-service indicators generated at the services layer.

About the Author

Mark O'Neill is chief technology officer at Vordel, a provider of XML security technology. He is the author of Web Services Security (McGraw-Hill Osborne Media, 2003). Contact Mark at [email protected].

comments powered by Disqus

Featured

  • AI for GitHub Collaboration? Maybe Not So Much

    No doubt GitHub Copilot has been a boon for developers, but AI might not be the best tool for collaboration, according to developers weighing in on a recent social media post from the GitHub team.

  • Visual Studio 2022 Getting VS Code 'Command Palette' Equivalent

    As any Visual Studio Code user knows, the editor's command palette is a powerful tool for getting things done quickly, without having to navigate through menus and dialogs. Now, we learn how an equivalent is coming for Microsoft's flagship Visual Studio IDE, invoked by the same familiar Ctrl+Shift+P keyboard shortcut.

  • .NET 9 Preview 3: 'I've Been Waiting 9 Years for This API!'

    Microsoft's third preview of .NET 9 sees a lot of minor tweaks and fixes with no earth-shaking new functionality, but little things can be important to individual developers.

  • Data Anomaly Detection Using a Neural Autoencoder with C#

    Dr. James McCaffrey of Microsoft Research tackles the process of examining a set of source data to find data items that are different in some way from the majority of the source items.

  • What's New for Python, Java in Visual Studio Code

    Microsoft announced March 2024 updates to its Python and Java extensions for Visual Studio Code, the open source-based, cross-platform code editor that has repeatedly been named the No. 1 tool in major development surveys.

Subscribe on YouTube