News

Planix Tool Takes on Build-and-Test Guesstimates

Planix, from ALTERthought, gives the best- and worst-case time scenarios for agile-development projects.

Getting projects done on time and under budget is the Holy Grail for development managers. Longstanding methodologies for estimating the size, complexity and cost of a software dev project include function point analysis and constructive cost modeling. But overall estimation is an inexact science.

The software engineering consultancy ALTERthought hopes to change that with its hosted application Planix. The service takes high-level information about a project-use cases or the "user stories" found in agile development -- and crunches that data with proprietary methodology to generate estimates for a project's build-and-test phase. Users can generate various outcome scenarios, from "most likely" to "best-case" and "worst-case," as well as "what-if" scenarios.

ALTERthought CEO Sunjay Pandey says Planix can help developers and organizational leaders formulate a more realistic project plan. "Stakeholders are notoriously visionary and optimistic," he says. "That's great, and you want to keep that vision for the business, but Planix lets you put it all down in black and white."

The tool provides project estimates based on a number of factors, including its depth and range of planned features; the complexity of the tools and languages being used; and the abilities of team members. It's also calibrated for a variety of languages and platform -- including C#, Java, J2EE, .NET, Ruby and Ruby on Rails -- delivering estimates that reflect the programming environment.

Planix is a beneficial tool for most development teams and projects, according to Pandey. "We've seen it work for projects that are 500 to 600 hours in size [and for] projects that are 14,000 hours in size," he says. "But it's probably not applicable on tiny projects -- something that's going to take less than two or three weeks."

Despite this, Pandey says the product does not run counter to the agile dev model. "There has been a perception that it's anti-agile. But agile is based on planning your project on what people are telling you." He describes Planix as a "marriage of formal planning and formal estimation in conjunction with the principles of the Agile Manifesto that is probably more practical than either one alone."

Planix is now in public beta.

About the Author

Chris Kanaracus is the news editor for Redmond Developer News.

comments powered by Disqus

Featured

  • VS Code v1.99 Is All About Copilot Chat AI, Including Agent Mode

    Agent Mode provides an autonomous editing experience where Copilot plans and executes tasks to fulfill requests. It determines relevant files, applies code changes, suggests terminal commands, and iterates to resolve issues, all while keeping users in control to review and confirm actions.

  • Windows Community Toolkit v8.2 Adds Native AOT Support

    Microsoft shipped Windows Community Toolkit v8.2, an incremental update to the open-source collection of helper functions and other resources designed to simplify the development of Windows applications. The main new feature is support for native ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation.

  • New 'Visual Studio Hub' 1-Stop-Shop for GitHub Copilot Resources, More

    Unsurprisingly, GitHub Copilot resources are front-and-center in Microsoft's new Visual Studio Hub, a one-stop-shop for all things concerning your favorite IDE.

  • Mastering Blazor Authentication and Authorization

    At the Visual Studio Live! @ Microsoft HQ developer conference set for August, Rockford Lhotka will explain the ins and outs of authentication across Blazor Server, WebAssembly, and .NET MAUI Hybrid apps, and show how to use identity and claims to customize application behavior through fine-grained authorization.

  • Linear Support Vector Regression from Scratch Using C# with Evolutionary Training

    Dr. James McCaffrey from Microsoft Research presents a complete end-to-end demonstration of the linear support vector regression (linear SVR) technique, where the goal is to predict a single numeric value. A linear SVR model uses an unusual error/loss function and cannot be trained using standard simple techniques, and so evolutionary optimization training is used.

Subscribe on YouTube