Letters to the Editor -- Visual Studio Magazine

Path to a Better IDE

By Readers of Visual Studio Magazine
08/01/2010

Peter Vogel's June column, "Upgrading to Visual Studio 2010," got readers talking about plugs-ins and pricing.

Another great thing about Visual Studio 2010 is Visual Studio Gallery! There are almost 2,000 extensions out there already with little gems like Open Data Protocol Visualizer, VSCommands 2010 and RegexEditor!

Archi
Submitted via Internet

I enjoyed the article but found one error -- the upgrade pricing is misleading. Owners of Visual Studio 2005 or 2008 Standard Edition are indeed eligible to purchase Visual Studio 2010 Pro without MSDN as an upgrade for $299. That's a pretty good deal. On the other hand, those of us who have Visual Studio 2005 or 2008 Pro without MSDN are forced to buy the $549 Visual Studio 2010 Pro with MSDN "Essentials" upgrade. If this were a full-blown version of MSDN, that would seem more than reasonable, but it's not. Once the one-year "trial" is over, you lose the right to continue to use any OSes or servers that you installed from MSDN Essentials. What's more, you can't directly upgrade prior editions of Visual Studio Pro without MSDN to Visual Studio 2010 Pro with MSDN "full." Instead, you have to buy the full retail version for $1,199. So the upgrade is a good deal for prior Visual Studio Standard licensees, but not so much for prior Visual Studio Pro without MSDN licensees.

Bryan Morris
Submitted via Internet

Easy Access
In his July 2010 Redmond Review column, "SharePoint Is the New Access," Andrew Brust applauds the Access 2010 team for the new Web database facility, and ponders the lack of similar advances for Visual Studio and .NET. "Why is all this so complex that it takes a product team in the Office group to integrate it and simplify it?" he asks.

.NET is too complex???? Are you kidding??? Compared to other languages, .NET is a dream.

Sam
Submitted via Internet

If you have ever developed or use any J2EE application framework, you would not complain that .NET is too complex. Microsoft better change the stupid name though. Only a marketing weenie at Microsoft could have come up with that name.

Anonymous
Submitted via Internet

About the Author

This story was written or compiled based on feedback from the readers of Visual Studio Magazine.

Printable Format

comments powered by Disqus

Featured

Cloud-Focused .NET Aspire 9.1 Released

Along with .NET 10 Preview 1, Microsoft released.NET Aspire 9.1, the latest update to its opinionated, cloud-ready stack for building resilient, observable, and configurable cloud-native applications with .NET.
Microsoft Ships First .NET 10 Preview

Microsoft shipped .NET 10 Preview 1, introducing a raft of improvements and fixes across performance, libraries, and the developer experience.
C# Dev Kit Previews .NET Aspire Orchestration

Microsoft's dev team has been busy updating the C# Dev Kit, a Visual Studio Code extension that enhances the C# development experience by providing tools for managing, debugging, and editing C# projects.
Hands On: New VS Code Insiders Build Creates Web Page from Image in Seconds

New Vision support with GitHub Copilot in the latest Visual Studio Code Insiders build takes a user-supplied mockup image and creates a web page from it in seconds, handling all the HTML and CSS.
Naive Bayes Regression Using C#

Dr. James McCaffrey from Microsoft Research presents a complete end-to-end demonstration of the naive Bayes regression technique, where the goal is to predict a single numeric value. Compared to other machine learning regression techniques, naive Bayes regression is usually less accurate, but is simple, easy to implement and customize, works on both large and small datasets, is highly interpretable, and doesn't require tuning any hyperparameters.