Developer's Toolkit

Blog archive

Modeling Business Processes Has Nothing to Do with Standards

I gave a workshop at the Enterprise Architect Summit Monday entitled IT Drivers for Business Process Modeling. When it came time for me to explain the plethora of language stacks and standards that comprise this field, my only option was to present an unreadable two-slide PowerPoint list of the languages, their standards body, and their purpose.

Then the fun began. Why can't BPMN and BPEL play together if they are both standards? What is the difference between a notation and an execution language? Isn't there an execution language that goes along with BPMN? Why are we using that one? What is the Workflow Management Coalition?

The fundamental problem in Business Process Modeling (BPM) is that there are competing standards that in many cases would be better off complementing each other. So the Business Process Execution Language (BPEL), an OASIS standard, actually competes with the Business Process Modeling Language (BPML), a standard of the Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI), now under the auspices of the Object Management Group (OMG). So the industry has adopted the notation language from this group, BPMN, but also BPEL from OASIS. See?

It gets even more complicated, but the point is that Business Process Modeling as a field is still pretty immature. The standards bodies (OASIS, OMG, and WfMC) have to work together rather than compete, and devise a single language stack that practitioners can learn and vendors can build tools for. There is a great deal of potential in BPM to bring together disparate applications that until now have operated in silos in the enterprise. SOA isn't sufficient unless you have a plan for what business activities it will address, and that's where BPM comes in. But it can't happen until we have a single language stack that everyone can work toward.

Posted by Peter Varhol on 05/16/2006 at 1:15 PM

comments powered by Disqus


  • Top 3 Blazor Extensions for Visual Studio Code

    Some developers prefer to create applications with Microsoft's open-source Blazor tooling from within the open-source, cross-platform Visual Studio Code editor. Here are the top tools in the VS Code Marketplace for those folk, as measured by the number of installations.

  • How to Invert a Machine Learning Matrix Using C#

    VSM Senior Technical Editor Dr. James McCaffrey, of Microsoft Research, explains why inverting a matrix -- one of the more common tasks in data science and machine learning -- is difficult and presents code that you can use as-is, or as a starting point for custom matrix inversion scenarios.

  • Microsoft Engineer: 'It's Time to Move OData to .NET 5'

    Microsoft engineer Sam Xu says "it’s time to move OData to .NET 5" and in a new blog post he shows how to do just that.

  • Microsoft Goes Virtual with Developer Education in Face of COVID-19

    Like many organizations that host developer educational events, Microsoft has gone virtual amid shelter-in-place directives and a surge in remote work stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Microsoft Enhances Low-Code Power Apps

    Microsoft's nod to the low-code movement, Power Apps, has been enhanced with a bevy of new features, including mixed reality, canvas/model support in a new mobile app, UX improvements and more.

.NET Insight

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.

Upcoming Events