Letters from Readers

Reader Feedback: Flash of Uninitialized JavaScript UI

Visual Studio Magazine Tools Editor Peter Vogel wanted to avoid the raw, uninitialized HTML/HTML5 that users sometimes see in their browsers before JavaScript properly arranges things. He checked in with an industry expert and shared the solution in his .NET Tips and Tricks blog: "Guru Tip: Avoid the HTML5 FOUJUI Experience". Readers commented:

I'm excited about HTML5 but Flash can do all these things (html5socket.com) DOT can do in a better way. Creating a slideshow in HTML5 -- wow! Flash did that 10 years ago! It's very easy to create a Flash animation -- a ball bouncing, for example -- in Flash Professional in less than a minute. JavaScript is a mess when compared to AS3.

Henry Chennai
Posted Online

What happened to the idea of sites that would run without JavaScript? I see far too many sites that only work if you enable JavaScript, even though they're not doing anything special with it. Requiring JavaScript in an application is fine; requiring it in a site is not.

Richard
Posted Online

Peter Vogel responds:
As a programmer, I assume that everything is better with code, of course. But you can still do a lot "declaratively" with these new technologies. However, once you start doing complicated stuff, it's a question of how much control you want to give the developer. A "procedural" approach that uses JavaScript gives the developer absolute freedom to manipulate the objects any way he wants. A declarative approach (new tags with attributes that let you customize the tag's behavior) inherently restricts you to those options that are offered. It appears that, in many cases, HTML5 has gone for flexibility with a procedural approach. That favors application developers over site designers, of course.

Contributing Code to ASP.NET
John K. Waters reported on Microsoft's announcements at Visual Studio Live! 2012 in late March. In his online report, "Live from Visual Studio Live!: Microsoft Opens Development on ASP.NET Projects"), he covered the company's decision to open the development of ASP.NET MVC 4 to third-party contributions and add ASP.NET Web API and ASP.NET Web Pages version 2 (code-named "Razor"). Readers reacted to the news:

Good-bye ASP.NET! Welcome Silverlight on HTML5/JavaScript (plug-in-less Silverlight)!

HDolder
Posted Online

It's all crap whose time has passed; I wanted nothing to do with it anyway.

Name Withheld
Posted Online

About the Author

This story was written or compiled based on feedback from the readers of Visual Studio Magazine.

comments powered by Disqus

Featured

  • .NET for Apache Spark Debuts in Version 1.0

    The open source project .NET for Apache Spark has debuted in version 1.0, finally vaulting the C# and F# programming languages into Big Data first-class citizenship.

  • In-App Reviews Come to Xamarin.Forms Android

    Android is playing a little catch-up to iOS regarding in-app review functionality, just now coming tp Microsoft's Xamarin.Forms implementation.

  • C# Slides in Usage Ranking of Programming Languages

    "The fact that C# lost three places in the ranking of language communities during the last three years is mostly explained by its slower growth compared to C/C++ and PHP."

  • Telerik UI for Blazor Updated

    Progress announced an update to its Telerik UI for Blazor components, targeting Microsoft's open source Blazor framework that lets C# coders create web apps without having to rely upon JavaScript.

  • Infragistics Unveils UI Components for Blazor

    Infragistics, specializing in third-party UI/UX controls and tools, unveiled a new offering targeting Blazor, Microsoft's red-hot open source framework that allows for C#-based web development instead of traditional mainstay JavaScript.

Upcoming Events